Some Thoughts On Kendal's Outdoor Connections Event
What did it reveal about where the outdoor and adventure industries stand on a number of essential modern topics?
For the first of my irregular series of columns for influential marketing platform MAD//Fest, I shared some reflections on this year’s Outdoor Connections event at Kendal Mountain Festival.
Read on (or read the original here), and let me know what you think in the comments:
If you’re at all paying attention, one of the things you quickly learn working in the outdoor industry is how much hidebound thinking there is among brands and marketers.
So the progressive roster and format pulled together by organisers Steve Scott and Joe White for Outdoor Connections, Kendal Mountain Festival’s first attempt at an industry B2B summit, is to be applauded.
Perhaps this is why the take-up among the outdoor industry’s assorted marketing departments, NGOs, agencies, (including my own, All Conditions Media), and other assorted industry figures, was so strong.
170 people attended, and the resulting day of panels and discussions revealed much about where the outdoor and adventure industries stand on a number of essential modern topics.
Fresh thinking is already here
Kendal Mountain Festival always has a theme, and this year’s was Hope. Personally, I took much hope from some particularly inspiring chats I had over the course of the weekend itself, and some of the contributions I witnessed at the Outdoor Connections event.
One of the reasons I invited Re-Action founder Gavin Fernie-Jones to take part in my Outdoor Connections panel on the topic of ‘Brand Purpose and Storytelling’, for example, is because his take on the stories the outdoor industry should be telling is so original and defiantly none brand-centric.
As I suspected it might, his articulate and emotional take on this most ubiquitous of modern marketing discussions gave the audience much to ponder.
Other highlights? A late night exchange with Tijana Tamburic, during which she explained how dreadful mistreatment of talent during her modelling career had been the catalyst to start her brilliant Female Narratives agency.
Like everybody, I enjoyed the contribution of Jeffrey Bowman of OTSDR Studio, who got the biggest laughs of the day during his ‘Shut Up and Start Talking’ presentation.
And I was inspired by Kesang Ball and Tom Wiltshire of Trippin’ and All Corners, whose ‘Contribute to Culture Without Extracting From It’ talk I found a useful and provocative counterpoint to some of the more transactional points raised earlier in the day.
As you’ll see below, these thought-provoking interactions continued throughout the weekend, and I left Kendal with the - yes - hopeful conviction that a new generation of entrepreneurs and thinkers are already shaping the way we will have these conversations in the future.
Patagonia still loom large over any discussion around brand purpose
In my January 2025 podcast series, The Announcement (below), I used Patagonia’s decision to make ‘earth’ their only shareholder as a lens through which to explore a number of key modern topics of discussion: the democratic impact of unelected billionaires, the reality of ‘business for good’ and purpose marketing for brands, the current state of philanthropic capitalism, among others.
Yet the conversation has always been missing something significant— a data-led analysis of what the brand’s move has actually achieved on the ground.
Thus, when Patagonia released their first Impact Report in the weeks leading up to Outdoor Connections, I was curious to understand how these findings would influence the panel on brand purpose I was scheduled to host with Re-Action’s Gavin Fernie Jones, Finisterre CMO Bronwen Foster-Butler, and Katie Moore of Yak Media (below).
As is always the case whenever Patagonia make moves in this arena, in the days that followed my LinkedIn feed was awash with binary, surface-level hot takes, many of which were the usual fan-boy and girling, but without any analysis of the actual data.
During my panel, I asked who’d actually read the report. The response was in single figures; fascinating in a room full of outdoor marketing and charitable sector professionals, many of whom are currently running campaigns putatively centred around this notion of ‘brand purpose’.
Perhaps this is because the report contains some truly challenging numbers around the reality of Patagonia’s impact, as well as confirming an uncomfortable reality: how difficult it will be for any brand to actually make an impact of real significance.
As I discussed with my panel, among the data, the report reveals something stark: that any business approaching ‘purpose’ as a purely storytelling proposition is missing the point dramatically.
After all, if the one brand that has geared their entire organisational structure towards achieving these goals can’t pull this off, then what hope for everybody else?
As ever, Patagonia’s transparency and leadership are to be applauded. What will be interesting is seeing who actually engages with the harsh lessons Patagonia is so generously sharing with the rest of the outdoor and fashion industries - and what influence this will have on the industry’s direction of travel in the coming years.
Access matters more than ever
A perennial theme at brand-led events such as Kendal Mountain Festival, but a significant change of tone this year. Above all, it is clear there is much work still to do.
Personally, I took valuable lessons from the live interviews I conducted with two influential creative leaders: filmmaker Orlando von Einsiedel, and wildlife presenter and scientist Dan O’Neill.
In my Saturday afternoon interview with von Einsiedel, for example, the Oscar-winning documentary maker described how he considers the ethics of access to be one of the most important aspects of his work, describing in fascinating detail how these considerations had influenced the improvisatory creative approach he’s taken with his remarkable new film The Cycle of Love.
It was a view echoed by fast-rising wildlife presenter, scientist and LGBTQIA+ advocate Dan O’Neill, who I interviewed at a riotous late Sunday afternoon session for my now traditional Looking Sideways live KMF slot, and who spoke authoritatively about this key topic, explaining how collaborations with the communities he works with across Asia and South America are a key tenet of his pioneering wildlife film-making.
Away from the stage, I was lucky enough to have similarly insightful individual chats with Alice Sainsbury, a designer who is challenging the outdoor industry, which still takes an ableist approach to product design by default, to bring access and inclusion much more to the forefront; and Sabrina Pace-Humphreys, the activist and cofounder of Black Trail Runners, who led an insightful panel with community fishing collective We Are Blackfish, at which access was also a key theme.
Sabrina is also at the sharp end of conversations with brands on this topic, and her insights into where they continue to fall short with tokenistic efforts were instructive and illuminating.
The conclusion? Talented, driven individuals and organisations are already out there leading this ever-more-important and subtle conversation. Brands and agencies should listen and learn.
It’s time for a new take on AI - and where were the women on the panel?
The more I hear people in marketing and brand circles discuss AI, the more it becomes apparent that there are very few original takes on this most hackneyed of modern topics.
At Outdoor Connections, part of the discussion was yet again given over to this now commonplace idea that AI is a technological inevitability that pragmatic businesses must embrace, rather than the late-stage capitalism data-and-attention-span land grab it so obviously is.
Let’s be clear - none of this is ‘inevitable’. As ever, it originates with clever people sitting in rooms and devising ways to sell their products to the rest of us (in this case with particularly consequential and globally significant sophistication).
It would be great to attend a panel (especially at an event full of marketers!) where this rather obvious truth was acknowledged and discussed.
As Gavin Fernie-Jones pointed out during our brand purpose discussion, the story we tell is always a choice. And we have the power to change it whenever we want. (Especially if we work in marketing).
So thank goodness for journalist and panelist
, editor of Sidetracked and Like The Wind magazines, and ‘defiant generative AI party-pooper’ (TM).Alex’s articulate, impassioned points about the impact these tools will have on actual humans, and the creative work so many people in the room claim to cherish, injected a much-needed note of moral clarity into what risked becoming yet more one-dimensional AI boosterism.
And why were there no women on this particular panel? On a day that had clearly been painstakingly curated, this was a rare misstep.
It’s too early to say if Outdoor Connections was a success. Next year will be the real challenge.
I have a long-established scepticism about the number of outdoor-adjacent ‘purpose industry’ conferences that have proliferated in recent years.
They tend to platform the same people, who have the same discussions in front of the same audiences, with very little actual - well - change resulting at the end of it all.
Too often, these inordinately expensive, self-congratulatory, pay-to-play events are networking or pitching hustles cosplaying as vehicles for change.
That’s why, despite the cautious optimism engendered by this first Kendal B2B event, it is too early to call Outdoor Connections a success. And as they begin to think about next year, the organisers should be asking themselves how they can avoid this trap.
Beyond the cash it could potentially make for the parent company, there’s little point in an event like this if it doesn’t lead to actual progress, and make a difference to the way the outdoor industry and brands contribute to or lead these conversations.
Otherwise it’s just any old back-slapping, networking bash with a fundamental dishonesty at its heart. And the last thing the outdoor industry needs is yet another excuse to mark its own homework.
Whether OC can build upon this promising start, bring in some fresh voices, and evolve to truly achieve something different, will be the real test in 2026.
Were you at Outdoor Connections and KMF? What were your main takeaways? I’d love to hear them:
There were many takeaways and thoughts floating around my brain about this one too and they are definitely still percolating
Thanks for getting me involved. It means a lot to be platformed. I think the Re-Action story is really starting to resonate, and it's brilliant to be able to share the story with others.
Great panels and discussions at the Outdoor Connections event. In fact, I enjoyed the whole festival, and left with a real sense that there is another story emerging. Lots of discussions everywhere, maybe not quite on the main stages, but plenty of conversations that are getting louder on the fringe.
I watched a set of beautiful films on Friday, about: building beehives for wild bees, reintroducing white tailed eagles to the UK, and the complexity of managing the wild horses that are over-grazing the Midwestern states. All of which told stories of citizen power, collective knowledge, and crowd-sourced actions.
As the credits rolled, I thought, we definitely don't need better storytelling, this festival literally celebrates the best storytellers, and they're incredible. What we need is a better story. One that builds collective agency, and celebrates citizen power. And, that we need to move it to the centre stage.