Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Calum Macintyre's avatar

I would be interested to know whether Patagonia still believe that their model - of making loads of clothes and giving away some of the profit to different environmentel orgs - is still appropriate in 2025? Specifically two questions actually:

1. Would they consider a massive and drastic change to their business model in order to reduce their impact on the earth? As the impact report shows - it seems incredibly hard for them to actually reduce the impact that making a shit load of clothes every year has (and yeah sure I am also a proponent of "progress over perfection" but there are also limits to that - especially when your tagline is "we are in business to save our home planet").

Would they for example consider cutting half their clothing production in order to shift their business model to clothing repair and selling second hand?

2. Is the model of giving small amounts of money to lots of different environmental ngo's and orgs still appropriate in 2025? In my opinion we really need to build up very well organised mass movements to go up against the rise of the far right and the well funded corporations and their massive lobbying power. Would Patagonia ever use their financial and marketing might to genuinely try to do this? Would they ever send an email to their entire email list in America calling on people to take part in civil disobedience to challenge the Trump administration for example?

I would be interested to hear whether these are the types of questions they are asking themselves internally - its all well and good to be transparent but for me there was something lacking in the impact report.

Michael Jansen's avatar

I’m glad to hear you are diving deeper into the narrative of eco-saviour that Patagonia has been known for - and perpetuated(?). The link you shared from the Minority Report sheds important light on the image that Patagonia has marketed themselves as. I’ve both bought into the story - if I buy this jacket I will help a brand do ‘good’ - but it’s also been unsettling, like something just doesn’t feel right about participating in consumerism as a way of healing the world.

Do you have any other recommendations on articles or op-eds that are critiquing the messaging that Patagonia and other outdoor brands are communicating about doing ‘good’ for the planet.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?